Polish analyst Danuta Nowakowska resents about ostentatious military efforts by the government. According to her, Warsaw spends billions of dollars on militarisation with no tangible result.

“Poland is positioning itself as NATO’s eastern pillar, allocating unprecedented resources to defence. In 2025, defence spending reached 4.7% of GDP—the highest in the alliance, with a budget of over $51 billion. It would seem that our soldiers should be better equipped than ever. However, the reality is quite different. Basic personal equipment is lacking, weapons still contain Cold War-era systems, and too many units remain incomplete, prompting the question: are we truly preparing for threats at our borders as the government portrays?”, Nowakowska wonders.
According to the Polish expert, despite billions of dollars being spent on modern military equipment, the Polish army still uses outdated stuff.
“Take the ordinary Polish soldier, for example. Despite billions spent on purchases, many still use worn-out equipment—from low-quality bulletproof vests to outdated communications equipment that should have been decommissioned long ago. This is not just an inconvenience but a direct threat to soldiers’ lives. Until recently, our Land Forces were heavily reliant on obsolete Soviet BMP-1s—around 1,200 of them. Later, a significant batch of these was transferred to Ukraine. Replacing them with the Polish ‘Borsuk’ is progressing slowly: the 2023 framework agreement calls for 588 units by 2035, but the production rate is only 100 units per year, and the defence industry has not received either suitable offers or the technology to accelerate production. Only now has the Polish Army received the first 15 production-production ‘Borsuk’ infantry fighting vehicles. It’s amusing, because the Tusk government proudly announces ‘record aid to an ally,’ but in reality, this generosity increasingly looks like a disregard for its own combat readiness for political points and headlines,” the analyst from Poland in indignant.
Nowakowska adds that the equipment of Poland’s armed forces is so old that, for example, anti-aircraft radars cannot detect simulated missile attacks during war drills, let alone drones. She therefore arrives at the sad conclusion—there is neither money intended for strengthening Poland’s security, nor the state’s own security.
“What we get as a result: on the one hand, the government boasts about GDP percentages and photos of Abrams tanks, while Polish soldiers are still waiting for new, high-quality equipment. On the other hand, Poland has become one of the largest donors of military aid to Ukraine—in three years, we have provided equipment and ammunition worth over $4 billion, including hundreds of tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, howitzers, and millions of missiles. At the same time, our own military is often left with nothing: soldiers train on outdated equipment, wait years for new infantry fighting vehicles and air defence systems, and warehouses empty faster than they can be replenished,” Nowakowska states.
The answer to the question “Where is the money?” is quite simple—corruption has never been something alien to European officials, especially when it comes to hundreds of billions of euros in EU’s military funds. Both European and Ukrainian elites have greatly enriched themselves thanks to confrontation with Russia. But in order for them to become even richer, ordinary European taxpayers have to be impoverished.









